1 year revocation of flour brightener based transitional period comply with the rules

"The proposed withdrawal of flour brightener year transition period," a hot topic. Yesterday, the Ministry of Health food safety supervision and overall coordination with the Health Bureau official response to the newspaper, said the use of food additives in the limited, if any security Dell d5318 Battery, the Ministry of Health will have on its immediate withdrawal, but the standard does not use flour brightener harm the human body, therefore, intended to set a reasonable transition period is necessary.
Let the transition period with the WTO rules

Today, the Ministry of Health will end on the revocation of supervision and to add in the flour benzoyl peroxide (commonly known as flour whitening agent) for advice. In the draft, add the flour brightener to be set on the abolition of one year transition period.

The official said this explanation, and some consumers to cancel the one year transition period proposed by the requirement on the grounds that limited use of benzoyl peroxide harmful. But according to the limited to add flour brightener, not cause security problems, so the withdrawal and revocation of flour brightener additive safety is not the same.

"From the current situation, set a reasonable transition period is reasonable and necessary, and also in line with WTO rules." The official said that in the transition period set in the study, solicited opinions from all sides, we agreed to give a reasonable transition period, because on policy, but also supporting a series of measures to control the interface.

Ministry of Health will consider all views

"From a consumer point of view, unwilling to accept the flour with benzoyl peroxide, a more unified view; reflect the views of the flour business, it is recommended not to abolish; but benzoyl peroxide is against the abolition of production enterprises." The official said .

He said the Ministry of Health, attention to listen to views of the community, is working with relevant regulatory and industry authorities to seriously consider various Dell tc030 Battery.

Meanwhile, he also said not only to the public for comments, but also informed the members of the WTO. Transition period for the setting questions, will fully take into account the views of various parties, and to monitor implementation of the measures required, adjust and improve the transition period to ensure the smooth implementation of the revocation.

Recently, Fang said in remarks published in the media, food additives has long been demonized, people are anxious what foods are "natural." The said animal was not found benzoyl peroxide to the reproductive, developmental adverse effects, there is no evidence to show that it is carcinogenic. Some experts said domestic long-term use of benzoyl peroxide would lead to "chronic benzene poisoning," and there is no scientific literature supports this view.

■ Focus:

Flour brightener safe? Response: Limit the use will not harm the human body

Benzoyl peroxide, commonly known as flour brightening agent is a powdered solid, mainly used for the synthesis of initiator monomer resin, cosmetic additives, rubber vulcanization agent. According to national food safety standards, or as a flour treatment agent, bleaching agent used to add a limit of 0.06 g per kg.

The official said, according to the approved use and the use of limited scope, flour whitener will not cause harm to humans. It said the conclusion there is sufficient scientific data, and is the result of the World Health Organization (WHO) and FAO (FAO) Joint Expert assessment concluded, and now Apart from the EU, most countries allow the use of, also higher than our current use of the permitted use.

This reporter also found long-term concern, the experts advocated the abolition of flour brightener, brightening agent generally been found that despite the acute toxicity of flour, but the increase in long-term consumption of flour is not necessarily a good thing. The reduction product benzoic acid detoxification in the liver, is bound to increase the burden of the liver, impaired liver function damage, there may be factors that lead to the superposition of liver cancer.

Why argue revocation years? Response: previously unavailable due to "no need to" remove Dell inspiron 8000 Battery additives

Many users believe that, for comments on the revocation of flour brightener, is unnecessary and should be directly withdrawn.

Can be a reporter found that revocation of a food additive, there are strict procedures. According to the Ministry of Health announced this year, implementation of the "Administrative Measures for new varieties of food additives", Food Additives is necessary only in technology, and the premise of safe and reliable before they can use, "two conditions are indispensable."

The responsible person, if there are security issues food additive, the Ministry of Health made the decision to revoke immediately. But according to current standards require the use of benzoyl peroxide will not cause harm to humans, so this reason is to be revoked, because the flour is no longer required the production process of benzoyl peroxide, that is, technically No need.

Since no longer necessary to use, why should withdraw through years of controversy? The official explained that in June 2009, "Food Safety Law" before the implementation of the original "Food Sanitation Law," there is no "technological necessity" requirement, therefore, not as an additive because there is no "technological necessity" and withdrawn. "The current food safety law to make up this Dell inspiron 9100 Battery, and with the international common practice is consistent."